Why more organisations are choosing a combined ICP and IDNO model
A new electricity connection should not make your project harder to deliver.
But across recent projects and discussions, many organisations still default going directly to the DNO despite struggling with delivery timelines, having a lack of visibility and fragmented communication.
A combined Independent Connection Provider (ICP) and Independent Distribution Network Operator (IDNO) model can offer a clearer, more joined-up route.
In this blog, we explain what this model means, when it can help, and how it could reduce upfront project costs.
What ICPs, IDNOs and DNOs actually do
Before deciding which route is right for your project, it helps to understand the roles involved.
- DNO: The Distribution Network Operator owns and manages the local electricity network in a specific area.
- ICP: An Independent Connection Provider designs and builds the new electricity connection.
- IDNO: An Independent Distribution Network Operator adopts, owns, operates and maintains the network once it is live.
When a combined ICP and IDNO model can help
This model is useful when your project needs more than a standard connection, such as:
- new developments requiring new electricity infrastructure;
- EV charging projects or wider electrification programmes; and
- sites needing more capacity now or in the future.

How it can reduce upfront costs
One of the main benefits is the potential to reduce how much you pay upfront.
New electricity infrastructure has long-term value because it will be used, operated and maintained as part of the network. This is known as Asset Value.
With a combined ICP and IDNO approach, this Asset Value can be calculated early and used to offset construction costs.
In simple terms, you may pay less upfront because the future value of the network is recognised at the start.
The option you think is quickest won’t be in the long run
Another common issue we see is energy infrastructure being bundled into wider construction contracts.
For example: A main contractor may say they will “handle the electricity infrastructure” as part of a wider build.
In practice, this often leads to:
- additional margin added on top of specialist work;
- limited technical expertise in energy infrastructure;
- no direct relationship with the network provider; and
- no consideration of long-term energy strategy.
Ensure that you choose a provider that focuses on power and connections, not just the buildings.
”“We needed a partner who could simplify a complex decarbonisation programme across a live trading estate. Stark stood out for their ability to manage everything end-to-end while keeping our pubs open and operational.”
Director of Sustainability, Fuller's
How Stark can support your connection project
Through Stark Works and Stark Infra, Stark can support the full connection journey.
We can:
Review your project requirements early
The earlier you understand your electricity requirements, the easier it is to choose the right connection route.
Before starting a project, it is worth reviewing:
- how much power you need now;
- how your electricity demand may grow in the future;
- whether your timeline is fixed or flexible; and
- whether a combined ICP and IDNO model could reduce your upfront costs.
Next steps
If you are planning a new electricity connection, upgrading an existing site or preparing for increased demand, now is the time to review your options.
A combined ICP and IDNO model can help simplify delivery, reduce upfront costs and give you more control over your electricity infrastructure.
Contact Stark today to discuss your project and find out whether a combined ICP and IDNO model is right for your connection.
Don’t miss out
Stay in the loop with our news, events and more direct to your inbox




